Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,502
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Weathernoob335
    Newest Member
    Weathernoob335
    Joined

Median to above confidence for moderate (major?) impact event, midweek


Typhoon Tip

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I really like where I sit here in Danbury. Pretty good indication that even if we don't sit in the heaviest banding for the majority that we do get into it and then it pivots through before slowly beginning to weaken. If this thing can sit somewhere long enough I could see a 12-18'' jackpot zone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JC-CT said:

Right? I'm always wary of being too aggressive writing off lower level warmth as model bias.

Especially after Friday, but the fact that there are heavy snow amounts near by implies the dearth of snow near the coast is more likely an artifact of modeling.....in the other system, they were out in NYS, which implies a synoptic issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JC-CT said:

Right? I'm always wary of being too aggressive writing off lower level warmth as model bias. Especially in March

I think right along the coast, it could be an issue and shouldn't be dismissed, but I'm not buying the contamination out to 495 and ORH area. That isn't going to happen with these low tracks. If the low track changes, then sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Especially after Friday, but the fact that there are heavy snow amounts near by implies the dearth of snow near the coast is more likely an artifact of modeling.....in the other system, they were out in NYS, which implies a synoptic issue.

I agree, more likely. And somebody in the subforum is getting a ton of snow from this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said:

I think right along the coast, it could be an issue and shouldn't be dismissed, but I'm not buying the contamination out to 495 and ORH area. That isn't going to happen with these low tracks. If the low track changes, then sure.

I think I'll be playing with fire, which is nice...I'll take my chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said:

I think right along the coast, it could be an issue and shouldn't be dismissed, but I'm not buying the contamination out to 495 and ORH area. That isn't going to happen with these low tracks. If the low track changes, then sure.

I would feel better if Ryan didn't clearly show thermal issues with his CT map.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I'll eat out of Steve's dog bowl if I get 8" of snow.

The likely scenario, if this corrects East, will be to reverse that map and give W zones 8-10" and your area 12-16".  Selfishly hope not  but I've watched that scenario time after time the past few years. 

 At least there are no great worries with a condensed to QPF field or sharp cutoff with this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

Huge run, colder too. Wouldnt say it caved to euro just yet...if you look at pretty surface maps, yea its east which is a good thing though. But the h5 is drool worthy how it is trending with quicker stream involvement and a stall.

Snows thru Fri weeeee.

I'm ready to mail you my subscription dues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dryslot said:

18z Reggie extended

 

SN_000-084_0000.gif

Definitely a theme for two areas of jack on some of these runs. 

This RGEM run puts the gap in VT/NH, NE MA and SW ME... the earlier NAM runs did it more down in CT and SE NY.  That'll be interesting to follow over the next 36-48 hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CT Rain said:

Seems like that's more an issue of just being bad with BL temps than anything else. 

Yeah I prob wouldn't worry outside of SE CT, S RI, and SE MA (perhaps immediate coast of eastern MA shore too) unless we start going to a 12z NAM track on reliable guidance.

I think those inside of 128 in E MA should not ignore it though...if Euro is more correct, then it will be paste right into BOS and even south shore, but not all the runs are doing that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

14 minutes ago, HIPPYVALLEY said:

The likely scenario, if this corrects East, will be to reverse that map and give W zones 8-10" and your area 12-16".  Selfishly hope not  but I've watched that scenario time after time the past few years. 

 At least there are no great worries with a condensed to QPF field or sharp cutoff with this one.

 

You might want to tag along to Pit 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...