Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,502
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Weathernoob335
    Newest Member
    Weathernoob335
    Joined

January 4-6 Coastal Bomb Observations/Nowcast


Baroclinic Zone

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Looking at radar, the precipitation shield is much more expansive with some heavy bands 50-60 miles west of what was modeled. I'm getting more optimistic about western areas and the Greens.

 

Latest HRRR seems to be throwing some better bands back into SW CT and up into the Berkshires as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Powderboy413 said:

10z hrrr really gives western mass some love, let’s do this!

If the difference between what it's showing for radar at hour 1 and the 7 flakes that I've seen is any indication, I'd say 'toss'.  Hopefully we'll over perform.  I'm guessing a high end of 6" here.  For you further south and east of the river, you'll do much better.  Enjoy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, moneypitmike said:

If the difference between what it's showing for radar at hour 1 and the 7 flakes that I've seen, I'd say 'toss'.  Hopefully we'll over perform.  I'm guessing a high end of 6" here.  For you further south and east of the river, you'll do much better.  Enjoy.

6" seems like a good number for you 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a little concerned looking at the IR and rotation, seems like last couple frames it's almost taken an ENE trajectory.. I also realize the precip field is expansive, but with the progressive flow, and now almost taking a 90 one has to wonder if totals will be less in Western areas now? My original call west of the river for 6-10 stands though.

 

-SN 19/11... approaching .5" OTG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tavwtby said:

I'm a little concerned looking at the IR and rotation, seems like last couple frames it's almost taken an ENE trajectory.. I also realize the precip field is expansive, but with the progressive flow, and now almost taking a 90 one has to wonder if totals will be less in Western areas now? My original call west of the river for 6-10 stands though.

 

-SN 19/11... approaching .5" OTG

That was expected and well modeled

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, tavwtby said:

I'm a little concerned looking at the IR and rotation, seems like last couple frames it's almost taken an ENE trajectory.. I also realize the precip field is expansive, but with the progressive flow, and now almost taking a 90 one has to wonder if totals will be less in Western areas now? My original call west of the river for 6-10 stands though.

 

-SN 19/11... approaching .5" OTG

I think that jog was expected and modeled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

The west ideas from the Nam yesterday appear to have been correct. A crushing coming for most folks here

 

1 minute ago, tavwtby said:

I'm a little concerned looking at the IR and rotation, seems like last couple frames it's almost taken an ENE trajectory.. I also realize the precip field is expansive, but with the progressive flow, and now almost taking a 90 one has to wonder if totals will be less in Western areas now? My original call west of the river for 6-10 stands though.

 

-SN 19/11... approaching .5" OTG

This ENE jog  at this point has been well-modeled.  I wouldnt' change the thinking, unless you were over-optimistic.

sn-, 14.8*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...