Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,502
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Weathernoob335
    Newest Member
    Weathernoob335
    Joined

Jan 4th 2018 Fish Bomb


Rjay

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
10 minutes ago, JetsPens87 said:

Could be the sloppy phase and too much energy entering on the backside of the trough trying to constantly push this thing east, also the low begins to become vertically stacked by our latitude.

With that said whomever gets underneath the death band/s will experience some much higher amounts because this is after all a storm coming from the tropics.

Exactly what I have been saying. As we have seen in past miller As that deform is going to have rates that are 3”/hr+. I still like Suffolk for the main deform band. Though there can be secondary bands back into the city

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LongBeachSurfFreak said:

Exactly what I have been saying. As we have seen in past miller As that deform is going to have rates that are 3”/hr+. I still like Suffolk for the main deform band. Though there can be secondary bands back into the city

Where the random Albany jackpots usually set up, I'm thinking with a storm this big this will be shifted east. I'm really not that concerned about the globals/skimpy QPF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Wetbulbs88 said:

Where the random Albany jackpots usually set up, I'm thinking with a storm this big this will be shifted east. I'm really not that concerned about the globals/skimpy QPF. 

Keep in mind, the secondary inland jackpot is often partially orographically driven.  That's why it normally hangs out over the highlands or the front end of the Catskills.  Here you won't have orographic effects, though there is an argument that frictional convergence at the coast can create a slight enhancement of lift over NYC and tend - but only tend - to park that last good band there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Drz1111 said:

Keep in mind, the secondary inland jackpot is often partially orographically driven.  That's why it normally hangs out over the highlands or the front end of the Catskills.  Here you won't have orographic effects, though there is an argument that frictional convergence at the coast can create a slight enhancement of lift over NYC and tend - but only tend - to park that last good band there. 

Very true and I was just about to add that myself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind, the secondary inland jackpot is often partially orographically driven.  That's why it normally hangs out over the highlands or the front end of the Catskills.  Here you won't have orographic effects, though there is an argument that frictional convergence at the coast can create a slight enhancement of lift over NYC and tend - but only tend - to park that last good band there. 

Could you please clarify what that means for lurkers like me? :-)

 

Edit: I googled it, no need to clarify. TIA though!

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NJwx85 said:

This really shows where exactly the banding will setup on the NAM. There will be subsidence to both the immediate West and East of this band, but it will be moving.

5a4d0486d4155.png

 

no it does not. vorticity is not a measure for location of vertical motion. it can be inferred but it’s misleading to say the bright red is where the band ends up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...