Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,507
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SnowHabit
    Newest Member
    SnowHabit
    Joined

Early Winter Banter, Observations & General Discussion 2017


powderfreak

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Thanks. That makes more sense. I remember a few people fired about my example.  Correct me if I’m wrong, but don’t first order stations do it every 6 hours?

Mostly. I would say every 6ish hours. We don't make people get up in the middle of the night if they are a volunteer observer, so sometimes that 06z measurement is skipped.

22 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Also how do you define settling? That’s kind of a gray area there. I wish they just kept it the same as we’ve been doing. 

They seem to be defining settling as you should measure as close to the snow ending as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
17 minutes ago, OceanStWx said:

Mostly. I would say every 6ish hours. We don't make people get up in the middle of the night if they are a volunteer observer, so sometimes that 06z measurement is skipped.

They seem to be defining settling as you should measure as close to the snow ending as possible.

If that’s what first order stations do, Is there a reason why this is not a homogeneous method across the board? It just seems like we have two methods out there to do the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

If that’s what first order stations do, Is there a reason why this is not a homogeneous method across the board? It just seems like we have two methods out there to do the same thing.

Workload? We are having a harder and harder time finding dedicated Coop observers, and I think measuring every 6 hours can be daunting for some. Plus measuring just once a day isn't wildly different in most cases. I know, blasphemy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OceanStWx said:

Workload? We are having a harder and harder time finding dedicated Coop observers, and I think measuring every 6 hours can be daunting for some. Plus measuring just once a day isn't wildly different in most cases. I know, blasphemy.

I think people usually only measure when they can anyways. I mean if you work, Obviously you can’t do it every six hours, you just do it when you get home. It just seems like we should have the same practice throughout, and I think people just do it when they can.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems they dont want weenies to steal first order stations glory, unless of course coop observers have option to clear every 6 hours for a valid report (they just are not required)

9 minutes ago, OceanStWx said:

Workload? We are having a harder and harder time finding dedicated Coop observers, and I think measuring every 6 hours can be daunting for some. Plus measuring just once a day isn't wildly different in most cases. I know, blasphemy.

The larger the storm, the larger the discrepancy.

For any storm that goes in record books, settling will steal up to 20% reductions in totals.

Unless observers (dedicated) ones have option of matching methods that first order

Stations do, (not required) but certainly wouldn't make any sense to discredit a more homogenous method being adhered to should the Coop observer do this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, STILL N OF PIKE said:

Seems they dont want weenies to steal first order stations glory, unless of course coop observers have option to clear every 6 hours for a valid report (they just are not required)

The larger the storm, the larger the discrepancy.

For any storm that goes in record books, settling will steal up to 20% reductions in totals.

Unless observers (dedicated) ones have option of matching methods that first order

Stations do, (not required) but certainly wouldn't make any sense to discredit a more homogenous method being adhered to should the Coop observer do this.

To be clear, there’s nothing that says they CAN’T do more than one, only that they are REQUIRED to do at least one measurement a day.

And of course some stations are REQUIRED to do 6 hourly measurements. 

So I wouldn’t say we’ve hanged recommendations so much as recognized that people can’t measure as often as they used to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Dan said:

Not sure if you guys saw this or not.  If it was already posted my apologies.

 

http://www.fox9.com/news/15-of-snow-falls-in-90-minutes

 

 

Just checked out the obs from the AWOS and holy f'in shiat.

PAVD 130713Z COR 33003KT 3SM FEW002 OVC070 M01/M01 A3006 =
PAVD 130711Z 33004KT 1 1/2SM SCT002 OVC070 M01/M01 RMK WATERSPOUT E0657 AO2 VIS 1/4V5 0651Z WEA =
PAVD 130709Z 34003KT 3/4SM VV001 M01/M01 A3007 RMK WATERSPOUT E0657 AO2 VIS 1/4V5 0651Z WEA =
PAVD 130705Z 00000KT 1/4SM VV001 M01/M01 A3007 RMK WATERSPOUT E0657 AO2 0651Z WEA =
PAVD 130658Z 1/4SM BKN002 OVC070 M01/M01 RMK WATERSPOUT E57 AO2 CIG 001V005 0651Z WEA =
PAVD 130656Z 12003KT 1/4SM +FC VV001 M01/M01 A3008 RMK WATERSPOUT B51 AO2 SLP210 0651Z WEA =

 

So a 6 minute waterspout offshore with what I would presume is 1/4SM +SN (no precip ID sensor there).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, dendrite said:

Just checked out the obs from the AWOS and holy f'in shiat.


PAVD 130713Z COR 33003KT 3SM FEW002 OVC070 M01/M01 A3006 =
PAVD 130711Z 33004KT 1 1/2SM SCT002 OVC070 M01/M01 RMK WATERSPOUT E0657 AO2 VIS 1/4V5 0651Z WEA =
PAVD 130709Z 34003KT 3/4SM VV001 M01/M01 A3007 RMK WATERSPOUT E0657 AO2 VIS 1/4V5 0651Z WEA =
PAVD 130705Z 00000KT 1/4SM VV001 M01/M01 A3007 RMK WATERSPOUT E0657 AO2 0651Z WEA =
PAVD 130658Z 1/4SM BKN002 OVC070 M01/M01 RMK WATERSPOUT E57 AO2 CIG 001V005 0651Z WEA =
PAVD 130656Z 12003KT 1/4SM +FC VV001 M01/M01 A3008 RMK WATERSPOUT B51 AO2 SLP210 0651Z WEA =

 

So a 6 minute waterspout offshore with what I would presume is 1/4SM +SN (no precip ID sensor there).

It looks like it may have been fog based on what the TAF had. Anyways..pretty epic..lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Dec 7th I recorded a high of 36.9F.  Next day 33.3F.  Then highs each day of 32F to 33F.  Past 3 days below freezing.  Too bad my temps have not been a degree colder or I would have quite a run at below freezing temps already, and now we are in the deep freeze.  Noticed that the bays of Newfound Lake are just starting to skim over with ice.  Lake and pond ice up here should thicken and expand the next few days especially if we can get a period of calm weather for ice to "catch".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, wxeyeNH said:

On Dec 7th I recorded a high of 36.9F.  Next day 33.3F.  Then highs each day of 32F to 33F.  Past 3 days below freezing.  Too bad my temps have not been a degree colder or I would have quite a run at below freezing temps already, and now we are in the deep freeze.  Noticed that the bays of Newfound Lake are just starting to skim over with ice.  Lake and pond ice up here should thicken and expand the next few days especially if we can get a period of calm weather for ice to "catch".

Today will make 6 straight with highs 32 or lower.  Tonight should be the month's first journey into single digits, and tomorrow night a run at zero.  Dec was 1.1F AN thru yesterday, should be BN after tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tamarack said:

Today will make 6 straight with highs 32 or lower.  Tonight should be the month's first journey into single digits, and tomorrow night a run at zero.  Dec was 1.1F AN thru yesterday, should be BN after tomorrow.

Nice.  Looks like anothe 6 days below freezing.  Should really help the lakes freeze over up here...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...