Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,507
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SnowHabit
    Newest Member
    SnowHabit
    Joined

Major Hurricane Irma


NJwx85

Recommended Posts

Looking forward to the 00z model runs, given they will be ingested with the critical upper atmospheric data from the G-IV flights as well as the central USA.  The runs should give us a much better idea where Irma may end up in 5-7 days; albeit, no forecast will be 100% at even 48 hours out, much less these lead times.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, Wow said:

If the southern motion has indeed ended for good, possible we could see a continuation of a northern trend in the next couple of runs.  0z especially important with latest data ingested.

Excited to see the 18z models, but really really excited for the 00z models. Does the data collected get ingested into all models (foreign models as well), or just the American models?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SN_Lover said:

I would wager the UKMET, especially, is wrong. The southern movement component of Irma has ceased. Might come back, but for the meantime, it's gone. A possible adjustment north might be reasonable at 0z. IMO. 

Agreed. I just don't see it verifying at all with no similar guidance from the GFS or Euro. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Wow said:

If the southern motion has indeed ended for good, possible we could see a continuation of a northern trend in the next couple of runs.  0z especially important with latest data ingested.

DT was saying this yesterday. Fully expects a correction north and east once the storm starts moving WNW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Subtropics said:

DT was saying this yesterday. Fully expects a correction north and east once the storm starts moving WNW

Of course,  with all things being equal,  I'd always place a greater probability on a more N track as an intense hurricane is looking for any weakness to escape the first chance it gets.  

 

Edit:  But, all things aren't always equal.   Tropical meteorology is a complex and inexact science.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the TUTT to the NW is still a key player in the near term.  I think its helping the Atlantic ridge to strengthen while at the same time keeping the ridge orientation on a more east west axis by giving the ridge some space to build into.  As it weakens and lifts/dissipates the Atlantic ridge will begin to expand north into that space allowing the storm to gain some latitude.  However if you look at the water vapor loop there are a couple of players that have popped up that may be accounting for the models trending even farther west.  There is a small mid level ridge that has formed just east of Fl that the TUTT is enhancing.  There is also some upper level cyclonic flow beginning to develop in the central Caribbean.  That weak ULL may be enough to tug Irma a little more west so it ducks under that ridge east of Fl.  Neither of those features were shown in the models 36 hours ago or so that I saw.   

   Just my 2 cents I've been wrong before ;)

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/tatl/flash-wv.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

I don't understand the idea that we have to see an eastward correction simply when WNW motion begins.  Seems like simpleton thinking.  There's a difference between anticipated WNW motion and WNW motion that happens prematurely and then gets more and more off course.

Yeah, if the WNW motion starts early then I would expect an adjustment but the models are predicting a WNW movement in a day or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

I don't understand the idea that we have to see an eastward correction simply when WNW motion begins.  Seems like simpleton thinking.  There's a difference between anticipated WNW motion and WNW motion that happens prematurely and then gets more and more off course.

Because a number of models continue the WSW motion for too long.  When they initialize further north next run with a due west trajectory, they're more likely trek further north.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Wow said:

Because a number of models continue the WSW motion for too long.  When they initialize further north next run with a due west trajectory, they're more likely trek further north.

In the case of those models, UKMET for example, there would be a correction. The GFS and Euro I believe stop the WSW motion this evening so any adjustment would/should be very minimal with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Dunkman said:

There wouldn't be much left of Irma if it followed the UK track. Just saying. That depiction of a powerful cyclone at hour 168 after that track is complete fiction. Its shredded remains would likely continue on into the gulf because it would be too shallow to be pulled north.

I think this is a great point. If it dives too far south and interacts too much with Cuba the weakening could cause the upper level steering flow to interact less. That could easily take Irma right into the central GOM like what the 12Z FIM shows. I think we're moving into a period where D5 forecasts have less confidence now than in days prior.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Wow said:

Because a number of models continue the WSW motion for too long.  When they initialize further north next run with a due west trajectory, they're more likely trek further north.

Not quite what I'm saying.  I'm saying IF the upcoming turn to the WNW happens on schedule, why would it automatically lead to an eastward adjustment on models at that point? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...