Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Model Mehham


Ginx snewx
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Damage In Tolland said:

Listen to the mets on here and not some phantom gfs run

It's not a phantom operational run.

The ensembles continue to show a brief 1-3 day warm up around the 20th followed by a return to normal or slightly below normal. It's all a matter of how far East the building trough sets up.

gfs-ens_z500a_us_55.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah the idea of coastal system affecting the weekend is gathering confidence... Multiple operational and ensemble member therein are supportive with the western end of the negative height anomaly first bifurcating to the N of the GL, then descending toward upper M/A..  classic multi-day behavior under westerly NAO blocking actually ...

That Euro is certainly the most entertaining ...being unwilling to completely shut the book on winter suggestion (again..) - seemed to get away from that (at last) for a couple days, now comes back with it.  Possible - can we get a synoptic snow later than 1977. Stay tuned!

Otherwise, the theme for the week has changed imo... Thursday and Friday (light winds away from the coast + low deep layer RH + 850 mb temperatures above 0 C) = 65 to 72 F regardless of machine numbers - which tend to come in dimmed over reality in that sort of synoptic set up...  Pretty clear difference compared to the 10 day stint scenario that was feared.

Then the coastal ...after which ..I could see things going warmer, but I don't know where "massive" came in... plus, the subjectivity of that term is useless, too.  Firstly, the idea of the pattern changing ~ the 20th is still in tact.  The impetus there is "approximately" ...  This 'art' of distant forecasting has never been about sticking with an exact dates anyway - that's always been, going back years of social weather-related media, an utter base-less invention/requirement by those looking from the outside, into the realm of what it takes to construct these outlooks, who don't have a f'n clue and therefore shouldn't even be around the establishment of standards   ... Secondly, it's plausible it's all moot anyway...?   If Friday gets to 72, what's left in that discussion anyway? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Yeah the idea of coastal system affecting the weekend is gathering confidence... Multiple operational and ensemble member therein are supportive with the western end of the negative height anomaly first bifurcating to the N of the GL, then descending toward upper M/A..  classic multi-day behavior under westerly NAO blocking actually ...

That Euro is certainly the most entertaining ...being unwilling to completely shut the book on winter suggestion (again..) - seemed to get away from that (at last) for a couple days, now comes back with it.  Possible - can we get a synoptic snow later than 1977. Stay tuned!

Otherwise, the theme for the week has changed imo... Thursday and Friday (light winds away from the coast + low deep layer RH + 850 mb temperatures above 0 C) = 65 to 72 F regardless of machine numbers - which tend to come in dimmed over reality in that sort of synoptic set up...  Pretty clear difference compared to the 10 day stint scenario that was feared.

Then the coastal ...after which ..I could see things going warmer, but I don't know where "massive" came in... plus, the subjectivity of that term is useless, too.  Firstly, the idea of the pattern changing ~ the 20th is still in tact.  The impetus there is "approximately" ...  This 'art' of distant forecasting has never been about sticking with an exact dates anyway - that's always been, going back years of social weather-related media, an utter base-less invention/requirement by those looking from the outside, into the realm of what it takes to construct these outlooks, who don't have a f'n clue and therefore shouldn't even be around the establishment of standards   ... Secondly, it's plausible it's all moot anyway...?   If Friday gets to 72, what's left in that discussion anyway? 

on the bolded, i'll give you a hint. the user names begins with "damage", and ends with "tolland"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

GFS SOS!

That's the second solution in a row the GFS has shown a slow moving soaker for the Mid Atlantic up thru New England.   Hopefully the Euro and UKMET continue to remain on board.  The UKIE trended towards the EPS ensembles last night which is a great sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Neblizzard said:

That's the second solution in a row the GFS has shown a slow moving soaker for the Mid Atlantic up thru New England.   Hopefully the Euro and UKMET continue to remain on board.  The UKIE trended towards the EPS ensembles last night which is a great sign.

Canadian is pretty wet too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dendrite said:

We're almost due for a Kevin post where he concedes and congratulates everyone for getting the miserable weather that he thinks we all supposedly want.

Well it looks like Mother's Day is ruined....congrats to everyone who wanted this and was rooting it on in the models.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CoastalWx said:

Now that is a wheel of  brown misfortune.

Just spins for days as it rots to our south and southeast.

 

That's not far from some decent flakeage on Monday morning even over SNE interior...prob won't play out like that, but that is a really deep ULL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like how between 168 and 192 hours, the vortex axis or rotation moves 0 latitude and longitude ...while simultaneously the ridge axis that starts out over the G. Lakes move E to roughly NYS... It pulls that off by filling the vortex rather than moving it away. 

Talks about hell-bent to keep conditions specifically schitty - it's found a way to do so without violating the principles of Atmospheric physics - haha.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...