Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Model Mayhem VI


Typhoon Tip

Recommended Posts

Just now, CoastalWx said:

Again that means nothing. Surface features are governed by mid and upper level features. If those change, so does HP. What it good, is that the antecedent airmass is about as good as it gets.

It means a lot actually. You ain't jamming a low up the HRV with a beast mode high there. Doesn't work that way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Agreed....I'd like to see the digging trend cease.

This GFS run was great, but leave it there.

 

Anyone have the 18z 10:1 map?

Enough with the glue sniffing Kuchie kids...

No reason to go for a Margarita this time around......lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hot damn the Kuchera crack from PivotalWeather: 1' DC and BOS, 2' PHL-NYC-ORH-BDL-PWM and back to ALB, 3' along much of this line, 56" for MWN.

Only SEMA weenies would be complaining, really. 

Shift that about 20 miles east, please.

Screen Shot 2017-03-09 at 6.14.39 PM.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CoastalWx said:

That foolish algorithm was like crack to weenies this year. It's seems like every year, weenies grasp on to the latest and sexiest weenie maps. 

I rather just look at the total qpf and use climo for the different types of storms, Always has worked and you can get real close to the results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, dryslot said:

I rather just look at the total qpf and use climo for the different types of storms, Always has worked and you can get real close to the results.

 

11 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

That foolish algorithm was like crack to weenies this year. It's seems like every year, weenies grasp on to the latest and sexiest weenie maps. 

14-24" verifies my winter outlook imby....I will probably be too low along the coast....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dryslot said:

I rather just look at the total qpf and use climo for the different types of storms, Always has worked and you can get real close to the results.

Right. Or, what you could do if your met savvy enough, is the go 10:1 and adjust on account for mid level features, DGZ etc.  I normally use QPF, mid level features, and soundings to determine how much snow. Oochie Coochie looks at temps in the column, but does not look at lift or saturation. At least as far as I know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

 

14-24" verifies my winter outlook imby....probably gonna be low along the coast....

If I pull off 60"....I'll smoke a cigarette come April and call it a season. My guess is we may not be done after next week though. Long range looks like there is some potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CoastalWx said:

If I pull off 60"....I'll smoke a cigarette come April and call it a season. My guess is we may not be done after next week though. Long range looks like there is some potential.

My outlook was really good, except for the fact that I should have switched January and February....thought January would be very good, February suck.

I pegged March for good snow and NAO assist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Right. Or, what you could do if your met savvy enough, is the go 10:1 and adjust on account for mid level features, DGZ etc.  I normally use QPF, mid level features, and soundings to determine how much snow. Oochie Coochie looks at temps in the column, but does not look at lift or saturation. At least as far as I know.

Exactly, 10:1 is a good starting point, Being on the coastal plain in alot of the mash potato/cement type storms, I find more times then not in the 7-10:1 range and the ones on the colder side with great mid level tracks in the 12-15:1 range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

I like weenies panicking already. 

Reminds me of my chickens pecking eachother before bed for prime roosting positioning. Unfortunately for James, he's at the bottom of the pecking order. Big beak, but not much bite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dendrite said:

Reminds me of my chickens pecking eachother before bed for prime roosting positioning. Unfortunately for James, he's at the bottom of the pecking order. Big beak, but not much bite.

Somebody has to take it on the chin for the rest to reap the rewards in most cases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Maybe aside from the thin sliver of H7 deformation out west....but 10:1 works more often than not.

Its just a much better starting point... I'd rather start with 10:1 and make my own changes to the ratios than let the model do it for me based on temperature.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if it was mentioned but the gefs h5 mean looks practically dead on similar comparing 18z to 12z, pretty remarkable to see imo. Its not until you slide back to 6z where youcan see how the trough is less sharp and a more proggy. I think this is a good sign the holes have been dug up and the goalposts are being taken off the truck. I dont want to jinx it so I wont say it. A huggies left and just SE of BE right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...