Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,507
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SnowHabit
    Newest Member
    SnowHabit
    Joined

February 9th Coastal Storm Discussion


Baroclinic Zone

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
3 minutes ago, J Paul Gordon said:

Is this gonna be like Feb 2013? Just keeps adding to the joy?

No, not nearly a long enough storm. We could see some 15-18" amounts...maybe even some 20"+ lollis can't be ruled out, but w'ere not seeing a widespread 30"+ jackpot with everyone else getting 20"+ in a storm that barely lasts 10-12 hours.

It's so hard to get those 18"+ amounts on a storm this fast. Maybe the best analog for trying to have that happen is Feb 5, 2001....though this storm might be moving even faster than that one did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said:

No, not nearly a long enough storm. We could see some 15-18" amounts...maybe even some 20"+ loolis can't be ruled out, but w'ere not seeing a widespread 30"+ jackpot with everyone else getting 20"+ in a storm that barely lasts 10-12 hours.

It's so hard to get those 18"+ amounts on a storm this fast. Maybe the best analog for trying to have that happen is Feb 5, 2001....though this storm might be moving even faster than that was did.

Thank you. Its feeding frenzy time, so some of the stuff coming out can be a little confusing out of context.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

No, not nearly a long enough storm. We could see some 15-18" amounts...maybe even some 20"+ lollis can't be ruled out, but w'ere not seeing a widespread 30"+ jackpot with everyone else getting 20"+ in a storm that barely lasts 10-12 hours.

It's so hard to get those 18"+ amounts on a storm this fast. Maybe the best analog for trying to have that happen is Feb 5, 2001....though this storm might be moving even faster than that one did.

We've been banging the 2/5/01 analog a lot in the NYC forum.  This looks like that to me (a bit faster), except a bit colder and faster.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, danstorm said:

We've been banging the 2/5/01 analog a lot in the NYC forum.  This looks like that to me (a bit faster), except a bit colder and faster.  

 

Yeah I was thinking of that analog yesterday....a fast moving system with insane snowfall rates. I agree this one looks even faster than that storm...that storm was about 12 hours....this one might be more like 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...