Jump to content
  • Welcome to American Weather

    Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Sign in to follow this  
SR Airglow

Model Mayhem II!

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, mahk_webstah said:

Two things I'm noticing this morning:

1.  My zone forecast shows high temperatures predicted Thurs-Sat are now lower than they were.

2.  The SPC 3-7 map has a decent high north of NE sitting there the whole time.  There is no cutter and next Monday there is a 996 storm approaching the TV, although the high looks to be further north, though strong, over Quebec near Hudson.  Doesn't look like a torch, although I don't know if that high will keep the TV storm on a good path for us.  Looks like it could be just a bit of a warm up here for a few days but then Canadian cold starts to press down and meet southern low pressure.  This could be happening by Mon-Tues, not Feb 1.  Am I missing something?  Actually what it missing is cold air.  I wonder if that can trend better for us.

And even if the source region isn't that cold....if we have a strong high in Eastern Canada over top of a deep snowpack, doesn't that not mean radiational cooling, dry air, low dewpoints....all advecting via that High into our region as the storm approaches on the 23rd or 24th? Even if it doesn't look cold, won't it actually verify colder?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was toying with the idea of cobbling together information for a new thread, ...  titled (perhaps) like, 'experimental: watching the 21st through the 26th for emerging storm signal'

...but, seeing this Model Mayhem thread successfully breach 50 pages... I think we should/could start a new model-based thread and I'll head it off with that content - if there are no objections. .. Kill two birds with one stone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

I was toying with the idea of cobbling together information for a new thread, ...  titled (perhaps) like, 'experimental: watching the 21st through the 26th for emerging storm signal'

...but, seeing this Model Mayhem thread successfully breach 50 pages... I think we should/could start a new model-based thread and I'll head it off with that content - if there are no objections. .. Kill two birds with one stone.

Have at it.  New model thread can be give...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

I was toying with the idea of cobbling together information for a new thread, ...  titled (perhaps) like, 'experimental: watching the 21st through the 26th for emerging storm signal'

...but, seeing this Model Mayhem thread successfully breach 50 pages... I think we should/could start a new model-based thread and I'll head it off with that content - if there are no objections. .. Kill two birds with one stone.

So Tip, I don't have the knowledge you and others have, are you speaking of the upcoming change many are saying gives us greater snow chances going into February? and less of so called torch spells?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×