Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

2016 Atlantic Tropical Discussion:Atlantic Looks Active North of 20N


bluewave

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
21 minutes ago, UnionWX said:

CMC is a NOLA hit. GFS has this bad boy recurving OTS after brushing the Florida coast. Ukmet hits SFL. Long days ahead. NAM starting to get into range..and oh, don't forget about the EURO..Long days ahead

 

Tracking the hurricane season is exciting. Just like winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No real evidence of a closed circulation on KJUA radar. Outflow looks good on the Northern and Western sides, but it looks like some southeasterly shear could be affecting a bit on the Eastern side. I think we're still a good 2-3 days away from seeing something meaningful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jason WX said:

NAM is stronger and more N

Normally the NAM is completely useless when it comes to tropical systems. In this case, it fits fairly decently into the model consensus with a location near the Bahamas in about 4 days and a ridge located over the Eastern US and Western Atlantic. The ridge is also building, shunting the trough well West into the Northern Plains. If this occurred verbatim, I see no way to miss a landfall on the East coast of Florida. 

Locally, we typically have less impacts when tropical systems landfall in the gulf, but with the ridge placement, it's possible that the remnants could track up the Apps. 

See TS Lee 2011.

lee_precip.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jason WX said:

More N too. A trend?

It really doesn't matter how far North it gets in the medium range. It's not going to come up the coast with that ridge building in off the East coast. A stronger ridge would only mean an even more favorable environment aloft as it cruises Westward towards FL. 

Nobody wants to throw out the obvious analogs here, but the track does look eerily similar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, NJwx85 said:

It really doesn't matter how far North it gets in the medium range. It's not going to come up the coast with that ridge building in off the East coast. A stronger ridge would only mean an even more favorable environment aloft as it cruises Westward towards FL. 

Nobody wants to throw out the obvious analogs here, but the track does look eerily similar.

Agree...it's going to turn sharply west once that ridge builds in.   This will improve the environment and we could see a big ramp up once the turn to the west has occurred...not saying this is an Andrew, but here's the track of Andrew-note the turn west once the ridge built in and subsequent rapid instensification once it turned due west.

-

at199202.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Brian5671 said:

Agree...it's going to turn sharply west once that ridge builds in.   This will improve the environment and we could see a big ramp up once the turn to the west has occurred...not saying this is an Andrew, but here's the track of Andrew-note the turn west once the ridge built in and subsequent rapid instensification once it turned due west.

-

at199202.gif

I think the track more closely mirrors Katrina; intensity wise too. Katrina was probably stronger than a CAT 1 when it landfalled in SE FL. I remember Jim Cantore saying that it was the strongest CAT 1 landfall that he had ever experienced. Also, Katrina wasn't even designated until reaching the Southern Bahamas. I mean, the similarities are astounding. It's going to end up likely being designated almost exactly 11 years later, just off by about 3-4 days.

  hurricane-katrina-storm-track-2005.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...