Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,505
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Dano62
    Newest Member
    Dano62
    Joined

February 15-17th Storm Threat


OHweather

Recommended Posts

gotta give props to ILN, they nailed this one.   For future reference, the nam was too far east with the precip, (totally whiffing us inside of 24 hours), even the gfs wasn't that much better.   Euro did very well.

But someone told me just a couple weeks ago that the Euro was having a "rough" year! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 758
  • Created
  • Last Reply

UKMET/EURO definitely win top prize with their handling of this storm. Fairly consistent showing a sharper, more amplified s/w and further west sfc track. Seemed like NAM/GFS/GEM were hanging on to the bitter end before they saw the light.

 

Pretty embarrassed that I was actually buying into those hi res solutions from yesterday morning. What happened was that those models were outputting the big snow #s around the same time the 12z NAM came in well to the west of its previous runs. So I thought it maybe we were starting to see one of those big NW trends that were more common about 6-7 years ago. But the HRRR/RAP have a known bias of being too amped, especially outside of the super short-range (like within 12 hours). I should have known better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UKMET/EURO definitely win top prize with their handling of this storm. Fairly consistent showing a sharper, more amplified s/w and further west sfc track. Seemed like NAM/GFS/GEM were hanging on to the bitter end before they saw the light.

 

Pretty embarrassed that I was actually buying into those hi res solutions from yesterday morning. What happened was that those models were outputting the big snow #s around the same time the 12z NAM came in well to the west of its previous runs. So I thought it maybe we were starting to see one of those big NW trends that were more common about 6-7 years ago. But the HRRR/RAP have a known bias of being too amped, especially outside of the super short-range (like within 12 hours). I should have known better. 

 

I made the same mistake. Those types of NW trends have been pretty common over the last few years. With a really sharp gradient, it's tough to pinpoint amounts.

 

In the end my 4-7" range wasn't far off. Have ~3.5" here. 7cm at YYZ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UKMET/EURO definitely win top prize with their handling of this storm. Fairly consistent showing a sharper, more amplified s/w and further west sfc track. Seemed like NAM/GFS/GEM were hanging on to the bitter end before they saw the light.

 

Pretty embarrassed that I was actually buying into those hi res solutions from yesterday morning. What happened was that those models were outputting the big snow #s around the same time the 12z NAM came in well to the west of its previous runs. So I thought it maybe we were starting to see one of those big NW trends that were more common about 6-7 years ago. But the HRRR/RAP have a known bias of being too amped, especially outside of the super short-range (like within 12 hours). I should have known better. 

 

Let's not give the UKMET too muc credit now.

 

It was way too amplied and too far west with the track of the surface (even had Detroit on the edge of the heavy snow for a few runs).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...