Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

STORM MODE THREAD- January 22-23 Mid Atlantic Storm Thread #4 - No Banter


stormtracker

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Maybe a stupid question, but what if the dropsondes introduce bias to the models - eg if they are dropped in am unrepresentatively moist area of the current storm? Then, the bias would propagate through all the models.

Some of it could be that now that the storm is actually happening and not just a digital calculation at initialization that NWP is getting a better handle on how to evolve what is already there and not what might/should be there. That in combination with sounding data should by default improve accuracy down the line.

With that being said, I don't think the gfs was accurate qpf wise. We're starting to look really good for the deform stuff imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of it could be that now that the storm is actually happening and not just a digital calculation at initialization that NWP is getting a better handle on how to evolve what is already there and not what might/should be there. That in combination with sounding data should by default improve accuracy down the line.

With that being said, I don't think the gfs was accurate qpf wise. We're starting to look really good for the deform stuff imo.

 

Right now, barring any indication otherwise, I'm sure the absolute numbers are overdone.  But the expanse of the precip field and getting us into the deformation area is the key like you indicate.  Even dialing back on the crazy numbers, the GFS still upped the bar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UKMET :o

 

From hrs 36 to 48, UKIE probably moves no more than 50-100 miles... looks like there's a capture as well

 

It just sits there basically until later Saturday night.  I haven't bothered to add up those QPF panels but looks like four 6-h periods of >10mm or >15mm, from what I could read on those maps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

   sorry to nitpick, but the GEFS *should* support the OP at this range.   Its perturbations need time to grow, so it's tough to significantly diverge from the GFS solution within 72 hours.

 

I know its outside its range, but the GEFS mean is so tasty and looks so nice... supports the OP nicely

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WPC Model DiscussionSYSTEM MOVING THROUGH THE SOUTHEAST/MID ATLANTIC COAST~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~PREFERENCE: NON-NAM COMPROMISECONFIDENCE: ABOVE AVERAGETHE 00Z NAM IS A NORTHWARD OUTLIER ALOFT SATURDAY MORNING BEFOREBECOMING A SLOW OUTLIER THEREAFTER -- THE NAM HAS A BIAS OFOCCASIONALLY BEING TOO SLOW.  A COMPROMISE OF THE 00Z GFS/12ZECMWF/12Z CANADIAN/12Z UKMET IS PREFERRED WITH ABOVE AVERAGECONFIDENCE.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

   sorry to nitpick, but the GEFS *should* support the OP at this range.   Its perturbations need time to grow, so it's tough to significantly diverge from the GFS solution within 72 hours.

 

Good point, hence the reason they aren't much help at this range.  I was just curious just how similar it was to the ops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mitch, I remember chatting with you in Feb 2003 saying we will never seen anything like we're about to see.. I think I lied.

Well, you hid the lie for 13 years, so you get some credit! People jokingly throw around the expression "shelter in place" all the time here. This time it really is no joke.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...