Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,502
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Weathernoob335
    Newest Member
    Weathernoob335
    Joined

Jan 23/24 Major Coastal Storm Discussion


Zelocita Weather

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Hopefully this doesn't get seen as an IMBY post but as you reach into northern Westchester the ridgelines start to run N/S and with an E/NE wind direction we tend to have slightly higher snowfall totals so hopefully my southern Putnam location on the east slop of a significant hill gives me closer to a foot than six inches.  Ehh, whatever I get is good, in fact less would be ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the basis for your opinion?

The doubled barrel low is often dismissed but I've seen it verify quite often. The CMC IMO displays this evolution very realistically. All that convection offshore alludes to that second low forming, as the primary can't push further north past the Delmarva the second low starts to take over and robs the primary of its moisture as the precip shield elongates. We still get hit hard but we miss out the the huge amounts you'll see around DC. This storm screams mid-Atlantic special and I don't think we see amounts over 10" north of NYC. Just my thoughts at the moment. The banding potential with this storm is through the roof so mesoscale features will be critical to snow amounts; we could end up seeing a large discrepancy in accumulations with some surprise locations north and west cashing in. This double barreled low evolution makes this forecast a lot trickier than it had appeared a day ago... Still a lot of details to iron out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The doubled barrel low is often dismissed but I've seen it verify quite often. The CMC IMO displays this evolution very realistically. All that convection offshore alludes to that second low forming, as the primary can't push further north past the Delmarva the second low starts to take over and robs the primary of its moisture as the precip shield elongates. We still get hit hard but we miss out the the huge amounts you'll see around DC. This storm screams mid-Atlantic special and I don't think we see amounts over 10" north of NYC. Just my thoughts at the moment. The banding potential with this storm is through the roof so mesoscale features will be critical to snow amounts; we could end up seeing a large discrepancy in accumulations with some surprise locations north and west cashing in. This double barreled low evolution makes this forecast a lot trickier than it had appeared a day ago... Still a lot of details to iron out.

I would buy the double barreled low idea more if it was occurring off the carolinas. I'm not as sure I believe it happening as far north

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The doubled barrel low is often dismissed but I've seen it verify quite often. The CMC IMO displays this evolution very realistically. All that convection offshore alludes to that second low forming, as the primary can't push further north past the Delmarva the second low starts to take over and robs the primary of its moisture as the precip shield elongates. We still get hit hard but we miss out the the huge amounts you'll see around DC. This storm screams mid-Atlantic special and I don't think we see amounts over 10" north of NYC. Just my thoughts at the moment. The banding potential with this storm is through the roof so mesoscale features will be critical to snow amounts; we could end up seeing a large discrepancy in accumulations with some surprise locations north and west cashing in. This double barreled low evolution makes this forecast a lot trickier than it had appeared a day ago... Still a lot of details to iron out.

 

Great post. I hate the dismissals that it can't happen. It certainly could. The GGEM's evolution looks more realistic than the GFS's to me at this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it can often be convectively related, it's less likely to see convection occurring that far north in these systems than say off South Carolina

 

Wouldn't you think it would feel the confluence more as it heads N hence why its trying to reform E? 

 

I mean you can clearly see it on the GGEM. Its getting squashed from the north so it tries to reform E twice within a 10 hr period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it can often be convectively related, it's less likely to see convection occurring that far north in these systems than say off South Carolina

Right.  Don't confuse anomalies with absolute temp.  It's warmer than normal offshore but still 10-15C cooler than off Hatteras.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't you think it would feel the confluence more as it heads N hence why its trying to reform E?

I mean you can clearly see it on the GGEM. Its getting squashed from the north so it tries to reform E twice within a 10 hr period.

It's certainly possible it could be doing it for that reason as well. 2/6/10 I believe went double barreled for that reason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The doubled barrel low is often dismissed but I've seen it verify quite often. The CMC IMO displays this evolution very realistically. All that convection offshore alludes to that second low forming, as the primary can't push further north past the Delmarva the second low starts to take over and robs the primary of its moisture as the precip shield elongates. We still get hit hard but we miss out the the huge amounts you'll see around DC. This storm screams mid-Atlantic special and I don't think we see amounts over 10" north of NYC. Just my thoughts at the moment. The banding potential with this storm is through the roof so mesoscale features will be critical to snow amounts; we could end up seeing a large discrepancy in accumulations with some surprise locations north and west cashing in. This double barreled low evolution makes this forecast a lot trickier than it had appeared a day ago... Still a lot of details to iron out.

I agree with you analysis 100% regarding confluence not allowing it farther north, possible dual low/relocation of center, etc. However, when guidance is showing a capture is taking place or imminent at best, a center jump of that nature doesn't jive. As I stated earlier, I think guidance will waffle with the capture vs non capture right up til the storm and we will be nowcasting this feature.

And unfortunately, this will be the difference between a 8-16" vs 12-24" storm for some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's certainly possible it could be doing it for that reason as well. 2/6/10 I believe went double barreled for that reason

 

I hate to be using the GGEM as an example but at Hr 78 you can clearly see it pump the brakes and actually start heading S before reforming to the E. Interesting, time will tell I guess

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GFS has moved south considerably over the past 36 hours. The precip maps seem overdone for our area. Upton says this in their AFD. Look at the upper air map. The low was once over the Delmarva, now it is over Cape Hatteras...on the GFS.gfs_z500_vort_us_14.pnggfs_z500_vort_us_24.png

 

This has major bust material written all over it. There is a lot of wishful thinking going on here. This is clearly looking like a NoVa/DC storm. The Euro's accuracy rate has been higher over the past week (see Ryan Maue's tweet). The only thing we have on our side is climatology. If there's no northward shift by the 0z runs tonight, it's time to call this off for us and hope we can sneak an advisory level snowfall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you analysis 100% regarding confluence not allowing it farther north, possible dual low/relocation of center, etc. However, when guidance is showing a capture is taking place or imminent at best, a center jump of that nature doesn't jive. As I stated earlier, I think guidance will waffle with the capture vs non capture right up til the storm and we will be nowcasting this feature.

And unfortunately, this will be the difference between a 8-16" vs 12-24" storm for some.

I agree with you analysis as well. I could honestly see this going either way, however I do sense that the models are starting to converge on the double low solution. Hopefully this trend will not continue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GFS has moved south considerably over the past 36 hours. The precip maps seem overdone for our area. Upton says this in their AFD. Look at the upper air map. The low was once over the Delmarva, now it is over Cape Hatteras...on the GFS.gfs_z500_vort_us_14.pnggfs_z500_vort_us_24.png

 

This has major bust material written all over it. There is a lot of wishful thinking going on here. This is clearly looking like a NoVa/DC storm. The Euro's accuracy rate has been higher over the past week (see Ryan Maue's tweet). The only thing we have on our side is climatology. If there's no northward shift by the 0z runs tonight, it's time to call this off for us and hope we can sneak an advisory level snowfall.

 

As it stands right now.... advisory snowfall would be at the minimum.  Even with the current depiction the GFS and GGEM still give the area 6-12 inches.  Let's see what the EURO has in store for us in a few.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GFS has moved south considerably over the past 36 hours. The precip maps seem overdone for our area. Upton says this in their AFD. Look at the upper air map. The low was once over the Delmarva, now it is over Cape Hatteras...on the GFS.gfs_z500_vort_us_14.pnggfs_z500_vort_us_24.png

 

This has major bust material written all over it. There is a lot of wishful thinking going on here. This is clearly looking like a NoVa/DC storm. The Euro's accuracy rate has been higher over the past week (see Ryan Maue's tweet). The only thing we have on our side is climatology. If there's no northward shift by the 0z runs tonight, it's time to call this off for us and hope we can sneak an advisory level snowfall.

Dude, that's a 100mi shift of a 500mb low from model runs 2 days apart.  That's not "considerably south", nor is it a "shift".  You're cherry picking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As it stands right now.... advisory snowfall would be at the minimum.  Even with the current depiction the GFS and GGEM still give the area 6-12 inches.  Let's see what the EURO has in store for us in a few.

 

As it stands, the GFS and GGEM give NYC 12-24".  Don't know where you're getting 6-12" from. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will likely be a storm that goes from a foot to little within 50 miles like 2/6/10. The dry air coming in on the north side means the sharp cutoffs shown on the NAM and GGEM are likely right. Hopefully for NYC these south trends stop, since although the confluence doesn't look as strong as that was, there will be a definite heartbreak zone north of where the banding can set up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude, that's a 100mi shift of a 500mb low from model runs 2 days apart.  That's not "considerably south", nor is it a "shift".  You're cherry picking

 

It's enough to hold the bulk of the precip south of us. Serious question: how far can mesoscale banding occur from the center of low pressure? Right now, pretty much all the guidance is outside the BM. If you look at the precip map, everything looks fine and dandy, but the upper air maps look very close to the Euro runs. Not sure how we're supposed to get a foot of snow if the low tracks due east of the Outer Banks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...