Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,502
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Weathernoob335
    Newest Member
    Weathernoob335
    Joined

No Joaquin the park forecast for Mets


Ginx snewx

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

00z GFS looks like a capture and northwestward turn as it reaches the latitude of the Outer Banks of NC.  Plus, I don't think its an EWRC but there is some fluctuations going on in the inner core right now which is why there is no discernible eye on IR.

 

More of a Northward turn rather than NW to my eyes, a scraping of extreme southeastern New England (Cape Cod)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should have know this was going to happen after I posted the spaghetti with every single model going OTS and said as of now this does not appear to be a threat to our region. If you ever want to revive a storm, have me cancel it on SCW and it'll be back the next cycle.

 

Still dry for the region verbatim except the cape, but that's a substantial shift.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly doubt even a gfs like track is a major threat outside of an ACK brush. Really hard to get that thing west enough up this way. Seems like it's almost turning NW off HSE from fujiwhara interaction with the big cut off.

could have pretty impressive impacts for some in sne with this scenario. Obviously the south and east.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly doubt even a gfs like track is a major threat outside of an ACK brush. Really hard to get that thing west enough up this way. Seems like it's almost turning NW off HSE from fujiwhara interaction with the big cut off.

 

Yeah a rule I've always used over the years up in our neck is always hedge right of any modeled track as it gains latitude unless there is an overwhelming reason not to. (like a bizarre Sandy type setup or some other obvious leftward steering mechanism)

 

Given the inconsistency of the GFS anyway, this is probably just another crap solution and I'd be surprised if the Euro and company came west outside of trivial movements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah a rule I've always used over the years up in our neck is always hedge right of any modeled track as it gains latitude unless there is an overwhelming reason not to. (like a bizarre Sandy type setup or some other obvious leftward steering mechanism)

Given the inconsistency of the GFS anyway, this is probably just another crap solution and I'd be surprised if the Euro and company came west outside of trivial movements.

Agreed on both counts. I do the same with storms up this way. I need a compelling reason why it's coming west.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see why it's doing what it is doing regarding the changes NE of Maine and they may be real based on the last few runs, but it also may be moving Joaquin NW than N too quick which allows those changes to mean something. And yeah...we all should be aware of how these things love to turn right anytime they sniff stronger westerlies. I wouldn't really change my thinking with one run of an inconsistent model.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see the NAO connection. The trough pushing through the area near Maine helps shove that ridge south. Quebec ridge is also a big stronger too, but that is not the NAO domain.

I'm not sure how you don't see an "NAO connection" given its inverse influence on the westerlies.

That image is not the "entire domain" but a sizable chunk of it. You can deduce the areas further north towards Greenland, based on the geopotential heights in that graphic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some interesting checks on the OTS train

While the 0z GFS shifted west late into a Cape scraper and the 0z NAM makes landfall in SC (where prior runs today were OTS), these 2 solutions had very little in common.

What had my attention more was the 18z GEFS bringing several members (8 of 20) making landfall similar to the 0z NAM track whereas the 12z suite had only 1 of 20.

Amazing how sensitive these solutions are to slight perturbations.

Not near a computer but very curious to see what 0z GEFS do....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure how you don't see an "NAO connection" given its inverse influence on the westerlies.

That image is not the "entire domain" but a sizable chunk of it. You can deduce the areas further north towards Greenland, based on the geopotential heights in that graphic.

 

I am looking at height based changes and I don't see your connection. The small change was from a s/w trough in Quebec and had little to do with the NAO domain. Those NAO changes you posted earlier don't have an immediate effect on small scale features. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...