Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,507
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SnowHabit
    Newest Member
    SnowHabit
    Joined

Mid FEB through March Threats/Snow Storms


mitchnick

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

that looks like a substantial shift, also look a little colder?

 

 

It's more subtle than substantial, but the orientation is definitely better...there is actually a panel that throws the western extent a little further but I tried to compare equivalent panels in terms of the low....Keep in mind the whole solution is still goofy with elongated lows, and a frontrunning low and multiple lows....I don't know that we will get hit, but I don't think anything is resolved yet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The UKMET surface looks more amplified than the other models and looks interesting at 96 hrs. Wish I got it's QPF.  I'd bet it look decent but that's just a guess. 

 

It's has been the most consistent model.  One reason is that it only has one low instead of two waves with varying degrees of injection of energy from the baha low like the other models.  Which way are you leaning?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's has been the most consistent model.  One reason is that it only has one low instead of two waves with varying degrees of injection of energy from the baha low like the other models.  Which way are you leaning?

I'm suitably non-committal.  I sort of like the more amplitude idea because of the position and strength of the ridge out west but the northern stream is going to play a big role in what happens and I have no clue about what it will do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...