Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,507
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SnowHabit
    Newest Member
    SnowHabit
    Joined

Winter 2014-15 Banter Thread


Stormlover74

Recommended Posts

Really ??? - I have proof that says otherwise -many including yours truly were predicting 10 inches + for the month

A snow contest from early November attaching snow to each month. Using that logic anyone in ur contest that predicted 6 inches or greater predicted snow for Xmas day. ?

No one said during this period would there be any snow on the ground for Xmas.

Go find the post where I said there would b snow on the ground xmas day.

As a matter of fact since about Dec 15th the call was the pattern changes Dec 28th.

The post is " some snow xmas week " was to DM and snow on the 28th world fit . As a matter of fact no one here not one person said there would b snow on the ground.

Pattern change Dec 28. Would actually imply the period before would have has to suck.

December blew up . But that doesn't change that once past the 28th the pattern gets better. For how long ? The euro says longer than the JMA weeklies says

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I think you are taking snow guesses in a for fun contest that were made two months ago a little to seriously

 

Its never a good idea to take a contest seriously when your guess is seriously wrong...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one said during this period would there be any snow on the ground for Xmas.

 

 

I agree...though the guy who predicted 25.8 inches for the Park this month would probably have to carefully place his projected snows to avoid having some residual stuff on the ground for Christmas...almost in land mine fashion...with thaws in all the right places...maybe a rainstorm for the 24th? (which we had!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just shows how optimistic most were in November - then when it was obvious in December that we weren't going to have a snowstorm in the near future most backed away from that positive thinking - but I am sure IF things turnaround and we end up getting much above average snow they will be bragging how good they are at long range forecasting..Also I could care less what you think about me taking it too seriously

Its all for fun..I don't think anyone who made a guess did so scientifically

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its all for fun..I don't think anyone who made a guess did so scientifically

since nothing in weather is a scientific guarantee their really is no difference with guessing except for those worthless pretty charts and maps that people put with those so called scientific outlooks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not what you say, it's the phony, sarcasm-dripped delivery. Clearly your forecast has been spot on, as has bluewaves. Kudos for that. You should try to be a bit more vein though.

roger.....

But DT can come in here and sheit the bed????

 

I wont let that happen again!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a difference between a pattern change with a chance of snow and several inches to feet of snow in your backyard.

Too many people judge a "pattern" by how much snow is in their backyard. It's insulting to meteorology to think that way and troll with that type of thinking.

You couldn't have said that any better. Clearly many forecasts could be in "jeopardy" with regards to total snowfall amounts. However, getting one guess or call right and truly believing all subsequent calls will be correct is like going to a casino and thinking you have a better chance of winning because you won the last bet. I didn't see what the post was, but the bashing of others is simply ridiculous.....especially when the one being bashed is a top-notch poster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All anyone can ask for is 1 have sound reasoning behind any ideas you bring to the thread and 2 just b cordial to one another.

Trust me if the pattern doesn't change for 2 weeks after the 28th I will feel like a bigger D@$_ than any of you will think I am .

But there is reason behind the call and its just our opinions And a little secret I'm not a MET I don't claim to be one I don't play one here.

I put together a puzzle of what I think the drivers and models look like.

If in the end they suck. I will know long before you will .

Going after smarter guys on the board just hurts the board in general .

Unless someone kicks ur dog or made u buy NG ( ahem) .

Let it go it's weather. Everyone here wants the same thing.

Just be cordial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

some of the warmest starting winters had a long period of below average temperatures later in the winter...1979-80 and 2006-07 had over a month with a minimum of 32 or lower...Some of the coldest winters didn't have a streak that long...2006-07 turned cold but didn't have a major snowstorm in the city...same goes for 1979-80...not to many of these years had a foot or more snowfall...that doesn't mean squat but is an interesting stat...I came up with this table from 1930 with 1917-18 added for comparison...1976-77 and 1969-70 were two of the coldest winters over the last 50 years and both had average snowfall with no foot or more single event...

season.....con/days min. 32 or lower...

1976-77...........51
1969-70...........45
1917-18...........44
1933-34...........36
1944-45...........36
2006-07...........36
1984-85...........35
1954-55...........33
1989-90...........33
1935-36...........31
1979-80...........31
2003-04...........29
1999-00...........28
1968-69...........27
1967-68...........27
1964-65...........27
2008-09...........27

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I've trended towards more off topic commentary the last few weeks...its mostly because the weather has not been very active from either a snow or noteworthy cold perspective...and there has been basically nothing to get terribly energized about since last February in those spheres...save for the nice snowstorm on the final day of March. 

If anyone found any of my posts terribly objectionable (I did not personally...but we're all very different people...as John Winger once wryly noted)...my apologies. 

I do make a concerted effort to keep my quasi off topic chatter in the banter thread...how far off topic one is entitled to go per the board rules is something I don't think I know the answer to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Pac jet firehouse is going to destroy the epo ridge after a few days. Trust me its a temporary feature. The pac jet means business. If one can get the disturbances to undercut the ridge rather than try and plow thru it we may be in business. I dont see that on about half of guidance. Im unfortunately being the pessimist regarding this because we have been down this road before in years past. Once that pac jet is roaring its tough stopping it. Last year the pac worked out for us. Will it turn in our favor? I really hope so but i am just being pessimistically cautious about this feature and its tenure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...