Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,502
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Weathernoob335
    Newest Member
    Weathernoob335
    Joined

Mid Atlantic Snow totals thread for winter 2013/14


Midlo Snow Maker

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 881
  • Created
  • Last Reply

4" on 3/30

 

Monthly Summary:

Nov - .25
Dec - 15.75
Jan - 17.5
Feb - 32
Mar - 17.25
 
Total 82.75
 
Lat 39.54
Long  -76.98
 
Details:

11/27 - .25

12/8 - 8.75

12/10 - 4.25

12/14 - 2.25

12/17 - .25

12/26 - .25

1/2 - 6

1/18 - 0.5

1/21 - 10.75

1/28 - .25

2/3 - 2.5

2/9 - 1.5 

2/12-13 - 24.75

2/15 - .5

2/18 - 1.5

2/25 - .5

2/26 - .75

3/3 - 5.5

3/17 - 5.25

3/25 - 2.5

3/30 - 4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt,

Any idea what Randy should have now? His last update was 31.5, which is low for north DC, especially with Ian at 42 not too far from him.

I've got two other "low" numbers as well:

NorthArlington (member) at 37.8

Dalecaria Res at 36.1

Those two points and Randy, are keeping the 30-39 line much further north than your hand drawn map

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt,

Any idea what Randy should have now? His last update was 31.5, which is low for north DC, especially with Ian at 42 not too far from him.

I've got two other "low" numbers as well:

NorthArlington (member) at 37.8

Dalecaria Res at 36.1

Those two points and Randy, are keeping the 30-39 line much further north than your hand drawn map

 

Randy has nearly the same elevation as Ian, but is on the east side of the park and doesn't do quite as well.  I'd guess he is at 40-41".  Punt Dalecarla. They are around 40" for sure.  They don't measure every event and do poor measurements.  North Arlington is certainly over 40".  Though not sure exactly how much.  Keep in mind my map is just for DC proper.  The reason why the contour starts so close to the water is because there is immediate elevation once you get inland. I doubt the 40" line is any further north than this.  This is just for DC proper.  This puts Randy right on the 40" line.  I realize for the type of map you are doing you have to broad brush.  But this is probably a pretty good guide.  Spring Valley and Wesley Heights are near 400' which is why the contour starts so far southwest.  

 

post-66-0-13317000-1396280929_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd guesstimate Randy's total as below in parentheses versus mine which would put him right on the 40" contour

 

12/8: 1.0" (1.25")

12/10: 0.5" (0.5")

1/2-3: 2.5" (3.25")

1/21: 4.5" (5.0")

1/28-29: 1.0" (0.75")

2/9: 0.25" (0.25")

2/12-13: 8.75" (10.0")

2/18: 0.5" (0.5")

2/25: 2.25" (2.25")

2/26: 1.25" (1.25")

3/3: 4.0" (4.25")

3/16-17: 7.75" (8.0")

3/25: 2.25" (2.5")

 

Total - 36.5" (39.75")

 

38.902543/-77.028075

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought snow fall measurements were taken at intervals during the storm and each is added to get the total.  If you just measure the final depth you don't have a true total snow fall.  Just an accumulation that depending on other conditions can be greatly reduced from the total.  If not, how is snow fall to be measured?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought snow fall measurements were taken at intervals during the storm and each is added to get the total.  If you just measure the final depth you don't have a true total snow fall.  Just an accumulation that depending on other conditions can be greatly reduced from the total.  If not, how is snow fall to be measured?

 

I don't know that we need to be measuring by some perfect rules, but you can't sweep a surface every 10 minutes...you can do it every 6 hours.  otherwise even in an ideal accumulating situation you will get inflated totals...for a slush fest like yesterday, the best way to measure is probably max depth...not accusing you of this, but we have to remember that snow totals are not a pissing contest...they are an accuracy contest...you dont get to become a spotter or observer by being the best or the biggest....sometimes you just have to stick a ruler in the ground (not grass) and take a measurement and use it, even if you think it is too low...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know where every ten minutes came from but I took three measurements during the event: 0.5"at 1820, 0.7" at 1930, and 1.1" at 2230.  Given the air temp. I thought it a more accurate method than sticking a ruler in the melted remains.  I'm still going with 2.3"  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I measured on a glass table, piece of plywood in the driveway, and a plastic table away from trees etc in yard this morning. Temp last night was 35 so it is possible I lost depth to compaction etc. but I think 1.5 is an accurate representation of ground truth by 6:00 am here. I take multiple measurements and average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know where every ten minutes came from but I took three measurements during the event: 0.5"at 1820, 0.7" at 1930, and 1.1" at 2230. Given the air temp. I thought it a more accurate method than sticking a ruler in the melted remains. I'm still going with 2.3"

What zwyts was alluding to is that there are "official" measuring guidelines that you can look up. So your method described here doesn't match how spotters and CoOp or Corcorahs observers are trained to measure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What zwyts was alluding to is that there are "official" measuring guidelines that you can look up. So your method described here doesn't match how spotters and CoOp or Corcorahs observers are trained to measure.

 

it is also more about the spirit of measuring in good faith...I am not saying he was disingenuous....but I generally think your snow total should be reasonably close to your max depth....Snow does compact and melt and we can't measure every 5 minutes, but if you record 2.3", you probably should have had close to 2" on the ground at some point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt,

Any idea what Randy should have now? His last update was 31.5, which is low for north DC, especially with Ian at 42 not too far from him.

I've got two other "low" numbers as well:

NorthArlington (member) at 37.8

Dalecaria Res at 36.1

Those two points and Randy, are keeping the 30-39 line much further north than your hand drawn map

You should probably just ignore my stats, I'm really pretty bad at measuring, and keeping track of it. I'm somewhere in the low forties, and that's the best I can do...

Sorry :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize I'm measuring snow fall and not snow depth.  As per NOAA guidelines http://www.crh.noaa.gov/jkl/?n=snow_measurement .  And yes, snowfall can be significantly greater than snow depth which is effected by moisture levels, temperature both air and ground, density, drifting....   I was trying all winter to record snowfall so each event was handled in this repeatable fashion. I thought this was how everyone was measuring the snow. If I have made a meteorological faux-pas my bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize I'm measuring snow fall and not snow depth.  As per NOAA guidelines http://www.crh.noaa.gov/jkl/?n=snow_measurement .  And yes, snowfall can be significantly greater than snow depth which is effected by moisture levels, temperature both air and ground, density, drifting....   I was trying all winter to record snowfall so each event was handled in this repeatable fashion. I thought this was how everyone was measuring the snow. If I have made a meteorological faux-pas my bad.

http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/coop/reference/Snow_Measurement_Guidelines.pdf  -- especially pages 7-9

Your mistake was the frequency in clearing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12/8/13:  7.5"

12/10/13:  3.5"

12/14/13:  1.5"

12/17/13:  T"
1/2/14:     5"

1/18/14:    T"

1/21/14:  8.5"

1/28/14:  0.5"

2/3/14:   2"

2/9/14:  1"

2/13/14:  18"

2/18/14:  1.0"

2/25/14: 0.25"

2/26/14: 0.25"

3/3/14:   4"

3/17/14: 6.0"

3/25/14: 2"

3/30/14: T

Total: 61"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize I'm measuring snow fall and not snow depth.  As per NOAA guidelines http://www.crh.noaa.gov/jkl/?n=snow_measurement .  And yes, snowfall can be significantly greater than snow depth which is effected by moisture levels, temperature both air and ground, density, drifting....   I was trying all winter to record snowfall so each event was handled in this repeatable fashion. I thought this was how everyone was measuring the snow. If I have made a meteorological faux-pas my bad.

 

I'll keep your 70.8, since for your area it does make sense given everything around you is 70" or higher. But yes, how often you are clearing your snowboard isn't correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it is also more about the spirit of measuring in good faith...I am not saying he was disingenuous....but I generally think your snow total should be reasonably close to your max depth....Snow does compact and melt and we can't measure every 5 minutes, but if you record 2.3", you probably should have had close to 2" on the ground at some point

I generally agree with this, but I think for some storms, 6 hours is too long.  Having said that, I didn't clear my measuring spot any this year.  I'm just too lazy to do it.  I'm sticking a ruler in the snow and whatever it says, that's what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I generally agree with this, but I think for some storms, 6 hours is too long.  Having said that, I didn't clear my measuring spot any this year.  I'm just too lazy to do it.  I'm sticking a ruler in the snow and whatever it says, that's what it is.

 

I think just generally using max depth is fine here and maybe tack a little on for compaction/melting since you aren't measuring every 5 minutes....at some point ecosense probably had 1.5 or 2"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I generally agree with this, but I think for some storms, 6 hours is too long.  Having said that, I didn't clear my measuring spot any this year.  I'm just too lazy to do it.  I'm sticking a ruler in the snow and whatever it says, that's what it is.

 

 

I think just generally using max depth is fine here and maybe tack a little on for compaction/melting since you aren't measuring every 5 minutes....at some point ecosense probably had 1.5 or 2"

Didn't NWS change their measuring methods for Co-ops, etc this year? If I remember there is to be NO board clearing, only what the greatest depth in past 24 hours. I argued about this with someone due to 'invisible accumulations' and the fact it would destroy snow ratios values that would occur during upslope and or lake streamers where it'd snow 1 with .05 liquid, melt off then 2.3 with .15 liquid, mostly melt off then another 1 inch and 0.05 liquid. They want you to report only 2.3? Where'd the other 2 go? :unsure:

Even worse, you now have 0.25 liquid on 2.3 inches of snow (9.2-1) instead of the 0.25 on 4.3 (17.2-1) ratio. Those two 0.05's don't disappear from your gauge just because the snow melted. :axe:  CoCoRaHS last I knew was still advocating the 6 hour snow clearing for boards.

 

EDIT- found the paragraph from NWS's snow measuring methods from Sept 2013-

3.1.3.
How to handle short events or multiple events in a 24-hour period
While acknowledging there is no perfect way of measuring snowfall, the following best practice accommodates the observer while ensuring the best consistency.
If the snow event ends well before the end of the 24-hour observing period
make the 24-hour measurement at the end of the snow event, if possible.
For example if the snow event ends at 1PM, make the snowfall measurement at that time. If snow falls later in the 24-hour period an additional measurement
can be made but report only the largest accumulated snowfall total.
No matter how many times it snows during the 24-hour period report only the
SINGLE highest snowfall amount that accumulated on the SMB.
Only clear the snowboard at the end of the 24-hour observing period.
If you cannot take a measurement at the end of the snow event, measure it as soon as possible after the event ends and no later than the official observation time.
See Figure 1 as an example.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...