RyanDe680

1 hour ago, A-L-E-K said:

"THERE IS A DANGER THAT SEEMS TO EXIST IN ALL VARIABLES I'M SEEING,   
THOUGH NONE ARE STANDING OUT IN TRADITIONALLY OBVIOUS WAYS." 

is one weird sentence

Sounds like some UNCERTAINTY SEVERITY

The block!!!

But  there's no block!

I feel like with all of these variants, we won't be able to keep up and know all the differences.  I read about something new in Iowa I thought?

5 hours ago, A-L-E-K said:

Happens to the best of us, maybe time to take out a mortgage, have a kid, move to the burbs, and try out the softer side of trolling 

fixed that...

Plumes say meh, little less than 1"

28 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

I wonder what percentage of 986 mb lows over Chicago lead to snow in Ohio.  

 

What a trash system.  So much potential and garbage looking results.

This sucks.

9 minutes ago, A-L-E-K said:

lol what

it was cold

8 hours ago, StormfanaticInd said:

Now at 95k hospitalizations. The rate at which we are dropping is really amazing. The vaccines are working. At this rate hospitalizations could be near zero by the beginning of March 

I don't doubt that the vaccines are working, but not enough to show in these numbers.  You're seeing a drop as we are coming off the holidays and people aren't having large get togethers like were happening during Thanksgiving, Xmas and New Years - that's what kept the numbers up through January... This drop was somewhat expected.

The real test will be into February, as this new variant that is more contagious and perhaps (unknown yet) more deadly.  If we can fend that off, then I would believe that vaccinations play a bigger role.

It's getting old having to scroll that much

I’m at about 10.5”

Lake effect seems overdone?

Just now, RCNYILWX said:

we're not competing with anyone and it wouldn't be hard to develop.

 

And unfortunately that’s why there will never be one.  
 

we’re fortunate to have you here 

Toss

Torching here.  Up to 33

I would think that the snow cover keeps us cooler in LOT and the screw hole south east of lot wouldn’t verify with these totals.  Satellite showed bare ground there.  

Just now, Chicago Storm said:

RGEM is drier as well, across IA into NW IL.

Had to check if I was in last weeks thread...

6 minutes ago, Malacka11 said:

Zing!

Just now, SchaumburgStormer said:

Calling double digits. 10.8”

^ yep

If this pans out as rain and the cold flows in, maybe not as dramatic as the GFS advertises, in the week following, talk about glaciers....

4 hours ago, A-L-E-K said:

they'll update in an hour or two, definitely a classic 6-10 look

and lol @ mbp1 which consistently shows like no qpf which would be a heck of feet to pull of in this setup

even this caved now... showing 0.50"

3 minutes ago, A-L-E-K said:

they'll update in an hour or two, definitely a classic 6-10 look

and lol @ mbp1 which consistently shows like no qpf which would be a heck of feet to pull of in this setup

but in it's defense, it gives us 0.50".....  of snow.

Plumes comfortably averaging 8.5", with 2 now above 12"  

1 hour ago, McHenrySnow said:

At least I talk about stale plume data brah.  
 

Yellow tag me 

speaking of which, 0.70” qpf mean.  Showing a bit above 7” so on a 10:1.  
 

based on that initial radar view, with an atmosphere quick to saturate, dare we say a chance of an over performer?