Jump to content

wasnow215

Members
  • Posts

    875
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by wasnow215

  1. 31 minutes ago, RVAman said:

    That's a SHARP cut off line. Maybe we'll cash in. No chance we see 3-4" with the marginal temps. Like RIC said, 0.5-1 inch on grassy surfaces more than likely the best bet. Hope I'm wrong. 

    But Euro does show 1/2 inch qpf falling in like 3 hours overnight. Could be 3-4” with those rates if it plays out like this particular run. 

  2. 1 hour ago, RVAman said:

    If we score a solid 1-2" off of this system I'll it a win for the winter and be satisfied. We are still a few days out, so maybe we'll luck out. Has there ever been a storm that looks like this one that absolutely just booms unexpectedly? RIC? 

    Yes, not like this but 12/9/18 definitely overperformed. I’m pretty sure the forecasted snowfall originally was 2 to 4 or 3 to 6.

  3. Human nature is funny. I’m not saying it will snow but at least it’s something to track now. I have observed that when it shows all rain or nothing we just don’t say anything or something to the effect of “it figures”.

    But when a good model like the European model shows snow and has been off and on for a couple of days, we say it’s not going to happen or won’t be much lol.

     

    Me? I think it keeps trending for Snow in a good way -keep the faith! 2-4” by 9am Sat morning. 

    • Like 2
  4. 45 minutes ago, blizzardmeiser said:

    Yup.  Cautionary tale for putting too much stock in long term models.   

    I respect people who tell us what they’re seeing with the LR stuff good or bad. Sometimes it doesn’t turn out. Better than people who say nothing and then say “I told you so”. Hard to tell you so if one has said nothing or just been negative OR positive with no or little backing. Not you personally as I have no idea what you’ve forecasted haha. 

    • Like 2
  5. 13 minutes ago, IronTy said:

    The panic thread has been the most accurate of the threads for several years running.  They should really just pin this one and let the LR thread languish because it's pretty useless as far as accurate forecasting goes.   

    Then why is it still called the “panic thread”? Shouldn’t it just be called the “Run of the mill-pessimism thread”?

    • Like 1
  6. 9 hours ago, katabatic said:

    I'm not sure a lot of folks should be throwing stones inside their own glass houses. Take a look at the snowfall forecasts from the beginning of winter in our little contest. A lot of people thought (hoped) this would be the yin to make up for 7 years of yang, but barring a late season fluke, it certainly looks like another bust. So we are all in the same swirling eddy of despair - doesn't matter if someone is a "quality poster" or has a colorful tag. The posters who, as you say, are leading the good fight are highlighting models that look good on paper but ground truth is anything but. Folks, the old rules NO LONGER APPLY, rendering these goddamn weeklies that we've been seeing day after day after day after day after day after day completely useless. That is the source of so much angst. We are just too goddamn warm and it is frankly scary how warm it has been for so long. I noticed that it is above freezing on the southern shores of Hudson Bay today. February 10th. Even in our toasty world that's obviously ridiculous but it is happening. Even out here in the Boonies, I had a good start but recently had days of +30 anomalies and its been 3 weeks since the last decent snowfall during prime climo. Looks to change at least IMBY next week - well, kinda - but I think the writing is on the wall (toilet bowl?) for another disappointing season. Soon, the reality will set in that swimming upstream ain't worth the effort. Model chasing is now the posterchild for an exhausting, diminishing return. 

    I mean-if the model chasing ain’t worth the effort, wouldn’t super long posts about the same be even less worth the effort?

×
×
  • Create New...