Jump to content

RippleEffect

Members
  • Posts

    244
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RippleEffect

  1. 10 minutes ago, MJO812 said:

    Agree

    This will change many more times but his post is a valid concern. 

    agreed wish we had a +PNA that would give us a nice great lakes trough! we'll see what happens. still very far away.

    • Like 1
  2. 26 minutes ago, forkyfork said:

    the gfs shows the problem with a -pna. this wave goes south of us but is too weak and we get light rain. the next wave amplifies and cuts too far west

    gfs_mslp_pcpn_frzn_us_22.png

    gfs_mslp_pcpn_frzn_us_32.png

    everything trends south this year so this is nowhere near the exact solution! this will change 10 times until it actually happens!

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    • Weenie 3
  3. 2 hours ago, jm1220 said:

    We have a chance at something decent if the Aleutian ridge can really pop. If it stays too South based the gradient won’t establish far enough south for us and the SE ridge will dominate. 

    we can still get snow with the southeast ridge if we got polar air just north of here

    • Like 1
  4. 5 minutes ago, DavisStraight said:

    Me and my wife got hit head on at 45 in Shrewsbury, she almost went through the windshield, to this day she has back problems she never had, I do too but always had them. It was a drunk driver that came into out lane one week after he got out of jail for DUI.

    did you sue? i would've. GFS looked better

    • Like 1
  5. 3 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said:

    From the related article:

    Wednesday has the potential to cause a bit of havoc for the tri-state with the chance of the city and surrounding counties seeing "significant" snowfall if the current incoming system stays the course, Storm Team 4 says. 

    To be blunt, this “Storm Team” should ride the proverbial bench. Three factors argue for a very low probability of significant (6” or greater snowfall):

    1. The current pattern. The fast flow and absence of blocking will not allow any system to stay around sufficiently long to produce a significant snowfall.

    2. The most snowfall for NYC during the December 1-20 period with an EPO+, AO+, PNA- was 4.7”. One would need very strong evidence to set aside historic experience. Such evidence does not exist (see #3).

    3. Aside from two GFS runs, the guidance favors a light event. Out of the 51 EPS members, just one shows 3” of snow and 3 show 1” or more. 26 show no measurable snowfall (12/5 12z run). 

    The headline and article do not serve the NYC area well.

    they do that for the views in my opinion. this storm has a "miss" written all over it

×
×
  • Create New...