Jump to content

StormySquares

Members
  • Posts

    69
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by StormySquares

  1. 1 minute ago, Bob's Burgers said:

    From a probabilistic standpoint, the 45% contour did verify. However the language used in the convective outlook was too strong (i.e. several long track, violent tornadoes) for the actual event. The shear profiles for Thursday are more supportive of a violent tornado than last week.

    I agree. It doesn't feel right that last Wednesday had the same probs as 4/27 or 5/24. This Thursday looks pretty impressive. 

    • Like 1
  2. 16 minutes ago, CheeselandSkies said:

    The LLJ problem is why I was skeptical of the high risk until the overnight models Tuesday into last Wednesday (when it seemed like less of an issue, at least according to the CAMs) and the 45% "let's tie the 4/27/11 probs over the exact same area" always seemed like an odd choice to me.

    For what it's worth a 45% did verify in Alabama. A large high risk area verified for much of central Alabama and eastern Mississippi. 

    • Like 1
  3. 4 minutes ago, KoalaBeer said:

    From earlier today. Looks pretty big but the base is obscured by the hill...from what I’m seeing these tornadoes don’t look super intense but there’s sure as hell a lot of touchdowns. That’s obviously a premature observation with a long way to go, hopefully it stays that way. Anyone else think MS might of kinda dodge a bullet as well? The main line of storms is getting ready to move through Jackson. 

    https://mobile.twitter.com/meteodon/status/1372299928018558980

    Not with the pacific front still back in Texas. It's only 22:30z. Up until this morning the main tornado threat wasn't until after 00z. 

  4. 1 minute ago, crossbowftw3 said:

    the most unfortunate part of this all remains the idea that SPC hoists potential PDS watches by mid-afternoon, and very little winds up happening until the jet kicks in, lulling people into thinking not much would wind up occuring.

    Spann has done a pretty good job of saying the primary threat for Alabama may not be until overnight. 

  5. 6 minutes ago, Orangeburgwx said:

    I see that too, it is a pretty close match. So now we got the NAM and The King on board, all others have to play catch up

    Sent from my LML212VL using Tapatalk
     

    Really the only model that isn't on board is the GFS, UKMet has been mirroring the NAM for the past couple days. 

  6. 22 minutes ago, hlcater said:

    In a raw 1v1, I'm inclined to agree, but the NAM goes against consensus here which is notable to me. It is very possible guidance trends in that direction(euro had a tick slower), but I don't see this reaching the levels the NAM thinks it will.

    Is it me or is the 12z Euro almost a copy of the past few NAM runs at 500mb. 

  7. 36 minutes ago, hlcater said:

    Looking like consensus is still sticking with a faster(rather than slower) evolution with this system keeping the ceiling much lower than it would be if it were to slow down significantly. Definitely still time for that, but seeing the 12z suite, I think the NAM is almost certainly the outlier on the slow end, GFS an outlier on the fast end. 

    12z Euro continues to slow a bit. 

  8. Just now, mob1 said:

    Not hitting anything, regardless of how strong the tornado is there needs to be something in its path to loft debris. 

    Plenty of trees in MS. The terrain it's going over isn't any different then when the cc hole was very deep. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...