Jump to content

MikeB_01

Members
  • Posts

    1,824
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MikeB_01

  1. 23 hours ago, RitualOfTheTrout said:

    We need some phase to get the NS involved though to get the cold, 6z GFS was really close to perfect, get that whole progression to happen a little faster and further SW and it bombs right over us vs central PA and look out. There in lies the the thread the needle aspect though, there aren't any other features to buy wiggle room, so it all has to time out perfectly which makes it even lower odds than normal.

    But dang... gfs_mslp_pcpn_frzn_neus_25.thumb.png.dc8a9d75099dfa301cf4b4d9b2f138f7.png

    Missed posting about this yesterday....

     

    is this a Cat 2 hurricane over Delaware?

    • Haha 1
  2. 30 minutes ago, TheClimateChanger said:

    Keep in mind that data is subject to smoothing, and there can be variances. The linear regression at PIT over that interval is actually positive, with a slope of +0.05" (or a gain of about 2.5" over 50 years). But most locations around us are negative, and substantially so. Cleveland, for instance, shows a negative slope of -0.29" per year (or a loss of about 14.5" over 50 years). So it's sensitive to start and ending dates - 1973-1974 was a historically bad winter for Pittsburgh, but not as bad elsewhere.

     

    Screenshot 2024-01-26 at 11.05.38 AM.png

  3. 1 minute ago, TimB said:

    Also, glad we missed out on the freezing rain, but is there a reason the advisory is still going? We’ve been above freezing the whole time, haven’t dropped below freezing, and won’t drop below freezing.

    Its interesting how far off the HRRR was on the temperature for this morning... 

     

    I think because there are some stations (PWS) hovering right around freezing, they will leave it as is. My PWS was 32 this morning. I only had sprinkles and it wasn't freezing, but the temp read 32°

×
×
  • Create New...