Jump to content

Hoosier

NO ACCESS TO PR/OT
  • Posts

    47,183
  • Joined

Everything posted by Hoosier

  1. Forward motion wasn't extremely fast but it wasn't a slow mover either. I think it was somewhere around 40 mph give or take.
  2. We've been incredibly unlucky this year with major tornadoes hitting large population centers. As far as fatalities, you really have to go back to 1953 (Waco, Flint/Worcester) to find something like this less than a month apart. Unfortunately, this type of thing may become less rare in the future with all the population growth and expansion.
  3. Posting this here as it may become a story of national interest... Obviously we have to wait for the survey but it looks like it may have been a violent tornado. The tornado appears to have tracked across the southern portion of the city and quite wide. It only happened a few hours ago and there are already reports of 24 deaths, but that number will probably rise. Joplin has a population of about 50,000. This is the latest example of a major tornado striking a densely populated area, an all too frequent occurrence this year. We have a member from Joplin by the name of JoMo. He was posting in the severe weather thread until the tornado approached. It is unclear whether he was hit but we have not heard from him since the tornado struck. Please keep him in your thoughts.
  4. I still can't get over that Bangladesh sounding. What would a warning look like? ...RADAR INDICATED A DANGEROUS SEVERE THUNDERSTORM CAPABLE OF PRODUCING VIOLENT TORNADOES AND BASKETBALL SIZE HAIL...
  5. Today was about as unstable of a mid-May day here as I can recall.
  6. We'd need to know the helicity to get a close approximation. Just looking at the CAPE and crudely estimating the helicity, I'd say the EHI would be over 15 and possibly approaching 20.
  7. ILX ran a special 18z sounding on 7/13/04: Low level flow isn't that impressive but there's nice veering with height. Also check out the max hail size...I have no idea how that is calculated
  8. Peoria sounding is the closest thing we have. Given the surface obs at the time of the tornado, I'm guessing the thermodynamic environment in northern IL was very similar.
  9. Yeah it's harder to get the good shear this far south in summer. Usually you have to rely on some freak meso/microscale interactions to produce strong/violent tornadoes.
  10. Jesus...I knew 8/4 was really unstable but I didn't realize it was that unstable. I wonder what instability is like in that area of the Middle East that often gets dewpoints well into the 80's.
  11. Obviously there are different ways to measure instability but I'm focusing on CAPE. I remember one from IA or NE last year or the year before which had MLCAPE well over 5000 (maybe over 6000). 7/13/04 was another crazy unstable day with SBCAPE over 7000 in IL. Another good one is the Peoria sounding from 8/28/90 with MLCAPE over 5500 (SBCAPE of 7000-8000 IIRC)
  12. I won't be surprised if the final number surpasses the total from 1974.
  13. Time makes people forget. Plus there's a little truth in the lake myth, but it gets exaggerated to the point where people think it will prevent something big every time. Cook county had 24 minutes of lead time on 4/21/67, outstanding for that era especially given that the tornado hadn't previously touched down yet in another county. Oak Lawn had about 25,000 people and the tornado damage path was only a couple hundred yards wide at most, but we got unlucky with a lot of people caught in traffic. I've read the damage survey and it seems like the only F4 damage occurred in Oak Lawn...so if that severe damage would've been more widespread or farther northeast, it probably would've been worse. There's been some frightening modeled scenarios about what would happen if a violent tornado tracked through Chicago. The area with rather high population density is much bigger though as you said.
  14. Long post so I'm not quoting the whole thing, but just wait. A mass casualty tornado is inevitable. It's been 20 years since Plainfield and that was only one violent tornado. Given the urban sprawl around there, that would be bad enough, but imagine 2 or 3 violent tornadoes in one day like 1967. It's hard to just pick one metro area in the US and say "this is where the next mega tornado disaster is likely to be" but your area is probably as likely as anybody. At least you have more basements than Alabama, but there's also more people.
  15. Well, my relatives in Tuscaloosa are fine. They are on the north side of town so it missed them. They know someone who works in the ER and I guess there are babies lined up in the hallway with no parents around.
  16. Obviously, but the question is whether one should be forced to have one. That starts to bring a political element into the discussion though.
  17. Technically, but you know how we roll in this subforum.
  18. Survey thread: http://www.americanwx.com/bb/index.php/topic/17853-427-428-tornado-outbreak-damage-assessment-thread/
  19. Hard to even fathom that, but it was hard to fathom 260 yesterday.
  20. What was the infamous line that Gary England told his viewers on 5/3/99...something like "if you don't get underground, you're going to die." If a TV met said that yesterday, there probably would've been a mass exodus out on the streets. In cases like this, there are bad options and there are worse options for the public at large. Unfortunately we had really bad luck yesterday.
  21. Even if some of the tornadoes in 1974 were off by one Fujita category, you're still talking about violent tornadoes from Indiana/Ohio all the way southward into Alabama. We didn't have that yesterday.
×
×
  • Create New...