Jump to content

WinterWolf

Members
  • Posts

    15,359
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by WinterWolf

  1. And you’re hoping that’s what exactly happens…you ain’t kidding anybody.
  2. I haven’t heard, or see that at all being the problem. The primary going to far north and east is killing this imo. If the primary was not making it as far north/or progged too, the secondary/coastal would get going further south, cutting off the warmth..thus we’d have a big wintry event on our hands. But that doesn’t seem to be the case.
  3. No shit lol…but it ain’t playing into this. Point is GFS colder.
  4. on the GFS…not enough for us…but it got colder. Where’s this SE Ridge your talking about?
  5. Ahh ok…. I was like, dam I must be missing out on a great day, cuz it ain’t that good here.
  6. Wish we lived there. Overcast all day here, and 48 at noon, and 53 currently isn’t all that beautiful…just saying.
  7. Not really Chris …the model is mediocre at best now. Anybody who is a regular here knows this. If it was by itself and showing what the CMC is showing, I’d be skeptical of it for sure, cuz it’s a mere shadow of itself now.
  8. Start of the south trend at 12z….by 18z everybody will be high fiving…
  9. Yea as Scott said…if this was showing the solutions from Friday…we’d all be giddy because that would have gotten it done easily, and we’d all be buried. It can happen at this time of the year…but you need the right set up, and everything to go perfectly. We can’t even catch one break this year for the most part(correction: actually CT did 2/13). But it’s been a crap two years for the most part.
  10. Not so much here…many others much better than 4/1/97 for CT folks. But it was a good event nonetheless here…just nothing historic.
  11. Lol..when the NAM is north and warm ….we’re told to not discount it. But when it’s south and cold, it’s discounted. Funny shit.
  12. At this point I don’t really care what it does…let’s do spring. But I do believe this will shift south as we close in. Just my gut feeling…the old over correcting BS.
  13. I think the GFS is wrong on this..but that’s just me.
  14. This 50-100 mile shift south we need of the coastal is plenty doable at 3-4 day lead as we know…that’s a small shift at this range. Can we do it. Let’s go NAO.
  15. Agreed. But if that block is modeled close to correct, and is legit…this should get squashed more south as we close in. Whether that translates to snow for SNE is a long shot for the most part.
  16. Sure…but that block is a beast, but then again that hasn’t helped us in two years either so? But, Is anything right at this lead? I guess we can ask ourselves that too?
×
×
  • Create New...