Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,506
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SnowHabit
    Newest Member
    SnowHabit
    Joined

Air Force’s plan to drop U.S. forecast system for U.K. model draws criticism


Recommended Posts

From The Washington Post:

 

The U.S. Air Force Weather Agency, which provides forecasts for Air Force and Army missions around the world, plans to replace its U.S.-based forecasting system with a model from the United Kingdom.

 

The U.K. model selected by the Air Force, known as the Unified Model of the United Kingdom Met Office, is widely respected. The Air Force says it will improve its forecast capabilities and lower its costs. Within a single framework, this model is able to provide both short- and longer-range forecasts over large and small areas — which is not a seamless operation within the current U.S. system.

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2015/04/20/air-force-to-cut-ties-with-u-s-weather-forecast-system-in-favor-of-uk-model/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From The Washington Post:

 

The U.S. Air Force Weather Agency, which provides forecasts for Air Force and Army missions around the world, plans to replace its U.S.-based forecasting system with a model from the United Kingdom.

 

The U.K. model selected by the Air Force, known as the Unified Model of the United Kingdom Met Office, is widely respected. The Air Force says it will improve its forecast capabilities and lower its costs. Within a single framework, this model is able to provide both short- and longer-range forecasts over large and small areas — which is not a seamless operation within the current U.S. system.

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2015/04/20/air-force-to-cut-ties-with-u-s-weather-forecast-system-in-favor-of-uk-model/

 

my thought: it's a real damn shame that the combination of austerity, lack of will to develop our own models and make observation input techniques better, and the lack of adequate leadership within the US Weather enterprise that our own military doesn't have enough confidence in our own country's products.

 

I wonder what the reaction in congress will be to this. will some finally use this as a wake-up call to finally invest properly in computing power and research above and beyond what has already been allocated? or could maybe others use this as a reason to cut research further, if not just say get the government out of the weather business all together using the same logic as they do for other otherwise worth-while government duties and services, by using the tried and true technique of not funding items adequately, then seeing that not funding it adequately makes that part fail, then saying the government has to not do it because they can't do it right, even if the reason they couldn't do it right is was they were never given a chance in the first place?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stoffer has been known for making some...strange...decisions for a decade+, even since before my time in the AF.  He started this when he was chief of AF weather in Europe and now that he's leading all AF weather globally, he's made this decision.  It's hard to envision this being a long-term solution. Have to believe there will be push-back at higher levels.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...